Eight Great Tips For Teaching Writing Fluency

With the inclusion of essays on high-stakes tests such as the SAT® and ACT®, as well as many state standards tests and high-school exit exams, the need to improve writing fluency has recently surfaced as a desired goal. Which approaches to writing fluency work best? 1. Teach students to read a variety of writing prompts. Expose students to different content area and writing domain prompts. For example, using social science, literature, and science content with informational, expository, analytical, and persuasive domains. Teach students to read the writing prompt twice-the first time for understanding and the second time to circle the subject and highlight key words. 2. Give students ample practice in turning writing prompts into effective essay topic sentences. 3. Give students practice in developing quick pre-writes to organize a multi-paragraph writing response. Teach a variety of graphic organizers and review how each is appropriate to different writing prompts. 4. Give students practice in writing introductory paragraphs after pre-writing. Give students practice in writing just one timed body paragraph to address one aspect of the essay after pre-writing. 5. Provide immediate individual feedback to students with brief writers conferences. 6. Use the overhead projector to use critique real student samples. Write along with students and have them critique your writing samples. 7. significance of a literature review how to pace various allotted essay times. For example, the SAT® essay is only 25 minutes. Most state tests allot 60 minutes. Brainstorm and allocate times before a full essay writing fluency for the following: analysis of the writing prompt, pre-write, draft, revisions, editing. 8. If a brief reading passage is part of the background for the writing task, teach students to annotate the passage with margin notes as they read.

Richard also learns that the unit does not approve of him reading materials outside of Party literature, claiming that other literatures are bourgeois, and not for the masses. Richard begins to fear their militant ignorance. Richard had joined the party because he considered them as blind to race, but he is shocked to realize that they are biased against those favored by other socioeconomic factors, such as education. Wright, is astounded that they can label someone who has grown up in poverty as he has as bourgeois. Their ignorance toward Richard's background serves to isolate him from the party and the Communist vision. Richard begins to interview Ross, a communist who had been charged with "inciting to riot," for his biographical book. But he begins to receive threats from party leaders with messages such as: "Intellectuals don't fit well into the party, Wright." One morning in Ross's home, a black Communist named Ed Green arrives and begins to question him. Richard. Green is a member of the Party's Central Committee - a man with power - and is suspicious of Richard's work. As days pass, Ross begins to speak less and less to Richard.

Soon afterwards, Ross is charged with anti-leadership tendencies. Richard' now begins to view their propaganda and tactics as embellished lies and impossible promises. He compares the Communist speaker and the black preacher which suggests that, like the church, Communism is nothing but blind faith. He blatantly questions the success of the Communist Party, asking if "the Negros could possibly cast off his fear and corruption and rise to the task." By the word "task," Wright means overcoming racial oppression and achieving unity. Richard drops his idea of making a book of biographical sketches and instead, uses his material from Ross to write short stories. As he begins to find a literary voice and ideological affinity in the leftist political ferment of the 1930's, he started writing and publishing widely. He wrote stories, articles and poems for the Daily Worker, New Masses, Midland Left, Anvil and Partisan Review. In April 1931 he published his first major story "Superstition" in Abbot's Monthly. The New Caravan and greeted as the best piece in the anthology in the mainstream newspapers and journals. He enjoys literary and social friendships with Bill Jordan, Abraham Chapman, Howard Nutty and Jane Newton.

How Long Should my Bio be? Not as long as this tutorial! But seriously folks, it depends on where you are marketing yourself. You will want to consider a few factors. Generally speaking, if you don’t know whether to use a short or long bio, you can easily take cues from other peoples’ examples and follow suit. If there is a character limit, like twitter, the answer will be obvious and you can post accordingly. A short bio should be to the point while still portraying what you want in a creative way. These are useful for social media like twitter, Instagram, freelance hiring sites, articles, or newsletters. The examples I have provided are short. However, while they convey all the information I want them to, I still left room to add detail if I find that I want to elongate them at a later time. A full bio contains your detailed profile. If you are writing a book, you have a lot of save to fill up on that back flap. Article was created by Essay Writers.

There, you can go hog wild with not only accomplishments, but history and how you got where you are. The same goes for personal websites. Often there are two spaces for two variations of your bio. The first is for you short 2-3 sentence intro, the second is more of an in depth look at you and your life, typically 250 or so words. Sites that offer space for full bios are blogs, work-related websites that feature faculty, school websites - or other platforms that allow for student and faculty networking, client proposals, and award and scholarship applications. First or Third Person Bio? When it comes to writing your own bio, you may want to naturally write it in first person, but first, consider where you will be putting your information. It may be best to stick to third person if you are writing for a company website, as you won’t be known as the author, and it will sound unprofessional and bias if you pepper your site with “I” and “me”.